Wobbly Universe

For many years I had an interest in cycles in many things - economics, sunspots, weather, climate, biology, astronomy, physics etc. Starting from trying to predict economic and business cycles for businesses my interest expanded until I gradually learned that there are cycles in everything and that many seemingly unrelated areas have exactly the same length cycles in them. Furthermore, the most common cycle periods reported are related by simple whole number ratios. Eventually I developed a theory based on non-linear physics that explained this and a lot of other stuff besides. I have spent about 15 years full time on this pursuit.

For those interested in this subject, I would recommend first reading the paper by Edward R Dewey The Case for Cycles which gives an overview of the most significant discoveries concerning cycles in many disciplines. More can be found at Cycles Research Institute.

My own work involved rediscovering much of what Dewey had (unknown to me at the time) already found. I found a reason for the patterns of cycle periods observed by him, based on non-linear systems. The basic laws of the universe must be non-linear, and GR is a non-linear theory. The Harmonics theory states that in such a non-linear system, any standing wave structure (any lasting energetic form) must develop harmonics of the wave and that each of these harmonics must do the same. This last clause is my contribution, because the formation of harmonics of waves was already well known. The maths of this and the consequences for the structure of the Universe are developed in my Harmonics Theory Maths pages.

The theory is consistent with GR but not with big bang bung cosmology. I would go further and say that it follows logically from GR and that the Universe is vastly older than the deeply flawed big bang cosmology suggests.

I welcome any questions and comments.