Post details: Mayan 2012 Prophecies and the Increasing Schumann Resonance

22/05/07

Permalink 03:17:20 am, by RayTomes Email , 1029 words, 8348 views   English (NZ)
Categories: Cycles, geology, social

Mayan 2012 Prophecies and the Increasing Schumann Resonance

Almost since I got access to the Internet in 1994, there have been repeated reports about two things that are now increasingly being linked.

1. The Mayan Prophecies of 2012.

2. The increasing frequency of the earth's Schumann resonance.

These are both solidly in the area of cycles and I often get asked about them. I just received an email from a friend about INTERNATIONAL BRANCH Of LION Of JUDAH. This site in turn quotes Weinholds.org where we can read "Welcome to the home page of Barry and Janae Weinhold and the Carolina Institute for Conflict Resolution and Creative Leadership (CICRCL), which provides evolutionary resources for shifting consciousness."

The stuff that we seek is on several pages and indeed the site map shows that there are 15 pages about the shift of 2012. There we can find this paragraph which was also quoted on the other site:

The Schumann resonance, also known as Earth’s heartbeat, has increased from its normal 7.8 hz. and is hovering around the 9 – 11 hz. level. It is expected to move to 13 hz, the frequency of unconditonal love. Gregg Braden, a geologist who has been studying this, calls this place where the Schumann or magnetic frequency and the electric frequency intersect ZERO POINT.

So perhaps it would be of interest to find out what the Schumann frequency is actually doing. There is a site that makes available information about regular measurements of ELF / ULF (Extra Low Frequency / Ultra Low Frequency) and the Schumann Frequency of the Earth. They have graphs of Schumann frequency from 1990 up to almost the present so we can see what is really happening. Two different laboratories have made the measurements, Arrival Heights, Antarctica (upper graph from 1990 to 2000) and Parkfield, California (lower graph from 1996 to 2003).

Schumann Antartica

Schumann California

Looking at these two graphs we can see that there is a slight variation in the Schumann resonance frequency. It goes up and down on some sort of annual cycle by about 0.1 to 0.2 Hz, and combining the two graphs together we can also see that there were peaks around 1991 and 2002 with a trough around 1996. It would appear that the 11 year sunspot cycle is also showing up in the frequency.

However there is no sign of an increase to the 9-11 Hz range as stated by Barry and Janae Weinhold and those that quote them. There are no dates on their web pages, so we do not know when they were written. They do say:

It is interesting that the largest increase ever recorded in the Schumann frequency occurred in 1987 and coincided with the eruption of Supernova 1987a and the Harmonic Convergence, when millions of people gathered at sacred sites around the world to pray and meditate together. If you remember, this is the time when Russell Boulding believes that the Shift might have really begun.

Well our graph doesn't go back as far as 1987, but certainly if anything unusual happened them (which would surprise me greatly) it had all returned to normal by 1990.

I also see that they in turn copied this information from someone else. Russell Boulding has a web site Preparing for the Great Shift. However I don't think that he is the origin either.

A google search for schumann frequency increasing 2012 says that there are 11,700 sites, but google usually overestimates by a large factor so that a thousand is more likely.

Why do so many people pick up and quote something that has no basis in fact? It appears that someone made this up (I am guessing about 1995) and since then it has been quoted and expanded by people who make a living by telling people all about the coming golden age and the frequency of love, when all around us there is war and destruction. I invite any of these people to produce evidence that the Schumann frequency is actually increasing, has reached 9-11 Hz or is heading towards 13 Hz.

For that matter, the idea that the frequency is moving from 8 to 13 Hz because these are Fibonacci frequencies is equally silly. You cannot say that 13 Hz is a Fibonacci number, because 13 Hz is the same thing as 13*60 cycles per minute or 780 RPM and 780 is not a Fibonacci number. Of course it is the 10th harmonic of the old 78 RPM records, so some is clearly going on here. (sarcasm! sarcasm!) Frequencies are not numbers - they have units. This whole thing of ignoring units and taking the numbers is totally meaningless and a sure sign that the writer does not know what they are doing. You can only look at things as numbers when they have no units which can also result from taking ratios of things that have the same units as then the units cancel.

The same meaninglessness applies to the supposed 2012 date of the Mayan calendar. This looks to me to be the equivalent of the Christian calendar turning over to 1000 or 2000 and nothing more. Of course humans made all sorts of fuss at these times too and nothing happened. I find no evidence of the end of the world. I find no combination of cycles coming together to make catastrophe at that time, and I have studied many hundreds of cycles.

I do find a time in the future when a combination of cycles come together to cause extreme catastrophe and a mass extinction event. I predict that this will happen in 42,000,000 AD. There will be a couple of lesser events in 4,000,000 AD and 16,000,000 AD but the really big one is still quite a long way off. For 2012 AD I don't find anything out of the ordinary.

When making predictions it is a good idea to give your past credentials. In 1986 I predicted that 1987 would be 1929 revisited, an accurate prediction. This prediction was based on my own cycles analysis of stock or share markets done in the 1980s and was verified with Edward R. Dewey's analysis which was done back in the 1960s. I have predicted no other such serious event in our time. I did repeatedly have a big laugh about the Y2K predictions. But just to be sure, I pressed the buttons on our washing machine with a long stick on 1st January 2000 (and again in 2001 in case that was really the millenium as some claimed).

Comments:

Comment from: tony scott [Visitor] Email · http://www.new.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1297043148
... the oneness movement coming from southern india are talking about the shift like this ---

http://www.onenessuniversity.org/oneness/cms/home/

around the end of 2012 there is a period of around 3 minutes
when something "flips" and @ that time if a certain %
of the human population are, what is classically & vastly misunderstood, as enlightened, then the whole species
gets this ...

they are promoting an energy transfer called "the oneness blessing" or deeksha that actually physically changes the brain so as to perceive this shift ...

there are a series of tests going on @ princeton atm checking the validity of the physical changes claimed ...

i have an 81 page pdf that, in a part of it, explains this in terms coming from the person who discovered it ... if u want
me 2 mail it to you send me an e mail 2 ,abacab42@gmail.com> and i will send is a one off post ...

i need 2 disclose that this shift, from separation to oneness, has already occured with me ... nov. '07 ...

your own intuition & instinct will lead you in responding to this comment ...

yours, in service........tony scott, sydney, aus.
PermalinkPermalink 11/09/08 @ 08:18
Comment from: Musical Instruments [Visitor] Email · http://hans-mymusic.com

Hmm I know now, thanks on the information
PermalinkPermalink 05/03/09 @ 09:54
Comment from: veli martin [Visitor] Email · http://martinkeitel.net
Some good points. But the 2012 is for real. I'm sure I can convince you of it, but personally I know it - because I'm almost there and so are many others. This may sound strange to you... You see, it's not that all humanity makes a leap at the same time. Many experience the shift of consciousness earlier, many later.
The Schumann resonance rising, it seems you are right that it's a myth, at least when it comes to physical measurements. For that resonance to rise, the speed of light should be rising... But if it is, then everything else in the physical world is rising, because everything is based on the speed of light - because it defines the basic frequency of this physical reality we're living in (well, many of us still are :) That would include the measuring devices as well. It means that if the speed of light actually IS rising, it can't be measured by any physical instrument that is made of physical atoms (which are made of light itself).

How could it be measured then? By something that is not made of atoms, for example the human consciousness. And how can the consciousness measure it? By experiencing a shift in the flow of time. Speed is determined by a movement through space within a certain time. If time is speeding up, it affects the speed of light, but affects the frequency of the entire physical universe that is made of light. Only non-physical observations allow the observation of this.

And anybody CAN observe it, just using common sense. Look at the progress that has happenened between 1800 and 1900, between 1900 and 1980, between 1980 and 2000, between 2000 and 2009. It's obvious things are speeding up. It's also obvious it can't go on for ever. The limit comes, when the difference of "outer time" and "inner time" becomes so great that nobody can take it anymore..

The process of personal growth here is to raise your frequency in order to enter the next vibrational level of reality and leave behind the so-called physical reality. All this may sound like utter nonsense to many - but it's simply because this is not the accepted mainstream truth. The fact is that this stuff is actually happening and anyone who's willing to accept the possibility of it, will find all the evidence they need. The greates evidence is personal experience, to actually LIVE the change. Once you get there, you will not look back. Believe me, you don't want to miss this.

Sorry for being so lengthy and sorry for any poor english, it's not my first language.

Veli
PermalinkPermalink 06/03/09 @ 10:01
Comment from: RayTomes [Member] Email · http://ray.tomes.biz/
Sorry for those posting messages and me being so slow to OK them.

Thanks Veli for your remarks. Your English is fine, thanks. We agree that Schumann resonance is not rising. Once that is disposed of, then the 2012 date remains as a speculation which could conceivably be true. I simply note that in 2005 a similar prediction was supposed to happen, and as far as I know just went on by like any other date. So I remain very skeptical about this one too.
PermalinkPermalink 06/03/09 @ 21:46
Comment from: online forex trading broker system [Visitor] Email · http://www.unclesamfx.com
For that resonance to rise, the speed of light should be rising... But if it is, then everything else in the physical world is rising, because everything is based on the speed of light - because it defines the basic frequency of this physical reality we're living in (well, many of us still are That would include the measuring devices as well.i found this informative and interesting blog so i think so its very useful and knowledge able.I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article
PermalinkPermalink 08/05/09 @ 03:52
Comment from: Scott Miller [Visitor] Email
Thank you for this. I too have followed the Schumann resonance for years, and could find only normal swings related to natural phenomena. Nothing I have seen suggests it is rising.

The Secret suggests that when enough people believe it, it will be true. I guess there aren't enough to change these facts...

The interesting thing is that people will take one erroneous bit of information like this and use it as the foundation to build huge theories (and web sites) around it. Obviously the reason people have come to this site is that some are still thinking for themselves and are checking the facts.
PermalinkPermalink 23/09/09 @ 10:05
Comment from: RayTomes [Member] Email · http://ray.tomes.biz/
Actually the Schumann resonance does change without the speed of light changing. It varies with the solar cycle and the time of day and some other things.

Agree with Scott that people take one erroneous bit of info and build a great structure on it. Somewhere I read "The truth is that which continues to happen, even when you don't believe in it". Good words.
PermalinkPermalink 23/09/09 @ 16:59
Comment from: vhufman [Visitor] Email
these charts are not current data. Not saying the trend has changed - no way to tell.

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."
Samuel Adams

A quantum leap occurs when the potential within the limit is fulfilled.
Unknown

The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about and refuse to investigate.
Wayne Dwyer

Each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand mediocre minds appointed to guard the past.
Maurice Maeterlinck.

All Truth Goes Through Three Stages
First it is ridiculed
Then it is violently opposed
Finally, it is accepted as self-evident

Mass consciousness or the tipping point or whatever term you choose - it has been proven in quantum physics that we create our reality consciously or unconsciously with our thoughts. So when enough thought energy is focused on the same thing, it has the potential of manifesting. In other words - anything is possible.
Treasure the journey
PermalinkPermalink 31/10/09 @ 10:05
Comment from: RayTomes [Member] Email · http://ray.tomes.biz/
There is a way to tell. You check what the Schumann resonance is now. The Schumann resonance is not rising to 13 Hz as stated by these people.

Yes, people who make progress in science are ridiculed by others. That does not mean that all who are criticized have made a useful contribution. Show me the evidence for Schumann frequency rising over some decades.

How many people do you think will be admitting that they got it wrong about the world ending on December 31st 2012 when 2013 arrives? They will be off making excuses and inventing new crazy stuff. The world will still be here, and still full of gullible people.

I am not one of the reactionary scientists that you think I am. Quite the opposite.
PermalinkPermalink 31/10/09 @ 15:25
Comment from: tallbloke [Visitor] Email · http://tallbloke.wordpress.com
Hi Ray,

Good to see your blog active again, and I hope all is well with you.

I've been investigating solar system resonances along with a few others (see my site) and from what I've been learning, any increase in Schumann Resonance frequency would likely be due to a shrinking down of the upper surface of the ionosphere.

http://www.spaceinfo.com.au/ionosphere20090112.html

Most agree this is due to the protracted solar minimum.

I found that I got an interesting correlation between z axis motion of the solar system barycentre and the solar equator (following up your post on BAUT) and sunspot number 30 years earlier. A strange twist to the arrow of causality but there it is.
http://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/ssn-ssbz.jpg

I also discovered a correlation between z axis motion and changes in Earth's length of day (LOD)
http://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/ssb-z-lod-temp.jpg

This time, the 30 year lag goes the other way. Given the ~60 year oceanic cycles, this leads me to believe there may be some funny resonances going on in the solar system we don't understand too well yet... :-)

I'm writing a post on harmonics in the solar system this weekend, please drop by and comment.
PermalinkPermalink 29/01/10 @ 15:59
Comment from: RayTomes [Member] Email · http://ray.tomes.biz/
Hi Tallbloke
Thanks so much for your very interesting analysis and links. That length of day one is very impressive. You should send this for publishing in a peer reviewed journal.
Great work!
Ray
PermalinkPermalink 29/01/10 @ 18:39
Comment from: Luc Sala [Visitor] Email · http://www.net.info.nl
There are a lot of people like Lynn McTaggart that point at Schumann variations, but then they work "scientifically', meaning referring to others that don't know or pretend to know. I like to know if the 10.72 Hz frequency that in my view is the cornerstone of prayer/magic/intention etc. makes sense. It is not related to Schumann, but to the sun, but how I don't know. There must be a relationship between this 10,72 Hz, the womb or dna frequency and the sun. Anybody with any ideas out there? www.net.info.nl
PermalinkPermalink 06/03/10 @ 10:51
Comment from: RayTomes [Member] Email · http://ray.tomes.biz/
Hi Luc Sala

The Schumann frequency is usually given as being about 7.6 Hz although it fluctuates slightly. The theoretical value is 7.5 Hz based on speed of light and Earth circumference. I think that there was some mention of 10.6 Hz in the early days. That figure is interesting because 10.6 Hz / 7.5 Hz is very close to sqrt(2) = 1.414. There are reasons to believe from Maxwell's equations that a standing wave will have velocity c*sqrt(2) or c*sqrt(3) if there is 2D or 3D symmetry, but only in the central half wave.
PermalinkPermalink 27/03/10 @ 16:31

This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Wobbly Universe

Blog of Ray Tomes research on cycles, news reports on cycles, my original research on the Harmonics Theory and discussion of these matters.

There are cycles in everything. There are cycles in the weather, the economy, the sun, wars, geological formations, atomic vibrations, climate, human moods, the motions of the planets, populations of animals, the occurrence of diseases, the prices of commodities and shares and the large scale structure of the universe. None of these are independent of each other.

Research shows that very different disciplines often find the same cycle periods in their data. The inter-relatedness of all things is an idea who's time has come. The study of cycles is an excellent way to understand this because the periods of cycles are as easy to recognise as fingerprints or DNA sequences.

"The universe, believe it or not, is nothing other than a giant musical instrument with a very special but predictable pattern of harmonically related oscillations which determine the structure of everything from galactic clusters to subatomic particles and we are just parts of the various vibration modes."

The single axiom of the Harmonics Theory is that:

The Universe consists of a standing wave which develops harmonically related standing waves and each of these does the same.

Search

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 2

powered by
b2evolution