Post details: A Radical View of Humans and the Sun as causes for Climate Change

09/06/07

Permalink 07:04:23 pm, by RayTomes Email , 1374 words, 1913 views   English (NZ)
Categories: Cycles, biology, climate/weather, astronomy, physics, economics/business

A Radical View of Humans and the Sun as causes for Climate Change

This article will put forward a view which will be considered radical by experts in physics, climate, human behaviour and probably many other fields. However that does not make it wrong. The fact is that something like 99.9999% of humanity have never been exposed to the thinking put forward here and so it has never been thoroughly tested for its validity. So you, Dear Reader, have a chance to be one of the very few who has a new way to look at things. If seriously considered, this approach will gradually cause connections to be seen between many aspects of the operation of the Universe and as a result the affairs of humans.

As background to the main argument I will present a few pieces of evidence that are relevant. They will seem like they are disjointed at first, but I will show how they make an undeniably strong argument.

1. Climate varies on many different time scales. There are fluctuations of hundreds of millions of years in climate that have major consequences for the type of and distribution of life on Earth. On this longest scale we are presently in one of the colder periods known as ice ages. There are variations of tens to hundreds of thousand years known as the Milankovitch cycles and we are now in a short inter-glacial that is due to end quite soon and return us to the prevailing ice age conditions. There are shorter cycles of hundreds to thousands of years that are not as strong as the others, but still sufficient to cause the rise and fall of civilisations as they make that little bit of difference in how hard it is for people to stay alive. When the going is easier, humans have spare capacity that they turn to culture and other activities than just staying alive. There are shorter fluctuations from decades to years and less, and we call these weather rather than climate. Still, they relate to the yield of crops and other important results in terms of human survival and comfort.

2. Measurements of variations in the Sun are strongly correlated with climate change on Earth. Although this is denied by some people who want to blame global warming totally on human activity, it is really self evident. If the Sun's heat output varies then it must affect temperatures on Earth. But further, it is demonstrated by many scientific papers. These variations are on many scales and many are known to be correlated with climate. There are also orbital and rotational variations of the Earth with respect to the Sun that play a part.

3. Humans have produced far more CO2 and other chemicals into the atmosphere in that last century or two than at any previous time in recorded history. Many people are concerned that human activity will detrimentally affect our environment and push it into some terrible positive feedback that makes the Earth a much more unpleasant place to live. If this happens it will be too late to try and reverse things, so it is wise to be cautious.

4. The evidence put forward regarding climate change an global warming has been highly politicised. This is because of fear and greed. The green faction fear the destruction of our habitat and so look at things with a biased eye to try and find that cause everywhere. The industrialists want to make profits and greed leads them to try to deny the problems. Scientists who write reports are often financed by or sympathetic to one group or the other, or have some additional agenda. Scientists are no less biased than other people, suffering from the same mental weaknesses of desire for income, desire for security and adherence to what they learned at home or school even in the face of evidence to the contrary.

5. Studies of electromagnetic fields (EM) effects on humans find that extra-low frequencies (ELF) can influence human reaction times and emotions. This is not surprising, because these ELF waves are in the same range as human brain wave rhythms. Waves that are slightly faster than normal brain waves can cause faster reaction times while slower ones cause slower reactions. This is quite an expected result as it is common physics for frequencies to entrain systems that have nearby frequencies through resonance. Additionally, other research has shown that people have more accidents when there is strong natural ELF just below the normal human brain wave frequencies. Again, it is no surprise that something that slows the brain and reactions down will cause more accidents, as our bodies move just as fast but our thinking does not keep up.

6. There have been studies that show that war has present cycles of period 11 and 22 years, just the same as sunspots have. The peaks occur at the same time. It is known that the Sunspot cycle cause big variations in the output of various frequencies of radiation and particles which arrive soon after at the Earth. The Solar output affects the Earth's EM field, causing variations in geomagnetic activity as well as fluctuations in the Earth's natural EM oscillation known as the Schumann resonance. This is the period at which the earth's EM field oscillates and it is right in the middle of the human brain wave frequencies, a fact that is probably not coincidence. Is it any wonder then that human behaviour is affected by the Sun, and that humans get more "uppity" and fight more wars at those times that the Sun is causing more agitation of the earth's EM oscillations and human brains too?

Taking all of the above together a pattern begins to emerge. Humans are more active when the Sun is more active. This applies to centuries long cycles as well as shorter ones. The peaks of all the major civilisations over the last few thousand years have been when the Sun is hotter and the earth also hotter. Cold periods have caused bleak periods where sometimes even the recording of history seems to almost die out. Now the question that naturally results from all this, but which no-one has asked:

Is extreme human industrial activity with its possible environmental aspects part of a natural cycle that follows from extremely high Solar activity in recent decades?

In other words, instead of looking for a human OR Solar cause to climate change, might we not see that Solar changes affect humans and that both affect the climate together? If we take away our normal judgments about human behaviour (a big ask I know) then we might see that humans are just pawns or cogs in the whole process. This is not to excuse that behaviour, but to explain its origin. We might still need to take action to change ourselves if we wish to avoid problems, but it should be action based on proper understanding of how we fit into the grand scheme of things.

I know that I will already have pushed many people into an uncomfortable idea, whether they be on one side or the other of climate debate. But sides are not useful, understanding is. And I will press on to the final step in this logic:

What if the Sun, like humans, is just a pawn or cog in the cosmic dance of energies?

This requires a leap of understanding that will need evidence that is beyond the scope of this article. However it can be shown that some of the Sun's has cycle periods are related to wider aspects of the structure of the Universe. The huge geological cycles that show in terrestrial geological formations are closely related to the waves of galaxy distribution in space. The Sun too is dancing to the Universal Cosmic rhythms that pervade the entire Universe. The entire Universe and everything in it is nothing but vibrations of energy, from sub-atomic particles through to galactic super-clusters, all are of the same essence.

In the future I will present further articles that will explain much more about these logical conclusions and show that there are very sound scientific reasons for this view. Whenever I have presented this material to people at conferences I find that it is well received, because people have a feeling for it that they cannot put into words.

Comments:

Comment from: Fan of your work [Visitor] Email · http://www.the-electric-universe.info/Scripts/troposphere.html
How do you see the Electric Universe in regards to Cycles?


http://www.the-electric-universe.info/the_electric_sun.html

A THOUGHT SOLAR EXPERIMENT

What happens if a small body falls into the Sun? Such a body could be a small star e.g. a "white dwarf". These can have more mass than the Sun (by 40%). Let us think that this small star has the mass equal to that of the Sun. The result can be that the solar core will have in its centre a hard and heavy component, much denser than the very dense solar core.

Nobody thinks that the white dwarf - as big as the Earth - could not attract all planets through the 700000km thick solar body which has its own big mass. It is quite clear, that the double of the new solar mass would produce a double of attraction by the higher gravity and our Earth would approach the new Sun in a spiral as long as its centrifugal force will not be double than now. (In the reality, the Sun could not survive the collision with a white dwarf. Fortunately it is only a thought experiment.)

However, very probably, a white dwarf is positively charged because it has a strong magnetic field up to 1000 Tesla - which could be the result of the quickly rotated electric charge. Is the positive charge of this thought central white dwarf detectable at Earth similar to the thought double strength of gravity in the case above? Would the electrons of the solar wind attracted by this positive charge which is in the centre of the Sun? The probable answer is: no, a positive charge in the depth of the Sun could not be detected at Earth. The solar plasma is not transparent for photons which are the carriers of the positive electric field. This field starts at the positive surface of the white dwarf. Many observations show that gravity can pervade plasma but the electric force cannot pervade plasma . One of these observations is the existence of the Sun as we see in the following simple calculation.

The Sun has the mass of 2 x 1033 gram. One of its protons attracts another proton via mutual gravity. Let us see the two halves of the Sun. The gravity of all protons of the one half of the Sun attracts all protons in the other half of the Sun. But all protons in excess (not neutralized by an electron) in one solar half repulse all protons in excess in the another half electrically. The repulsion is in each case 1036 times larger than the attraction. That means that already 0.001 gram of protons (in excess) in both solar halves has the same electric repulsion as 1033 gram protons via gravity-attraction.

Already 0.01gram of protons in excess would explode the Sun if the electrostatic repulsion could pervade the solar plasma! But the Sun is still there. Either, the Sun is totally balanced in its electric charges. It should have neither positive nor negative overbalance even not in milligram-range for the positive charge or microgram-range in electrons. The other possibility is that it is not sensitive if its electric charges are unbalanced. But the Sun cannot be balanced! Already before it was born, the mother-cloud was bombarded by the cosmic rays giving positive charge to it. Also young stars in the proximity emitted X-rays which ionized hydrogen and helium of the mother cloud i.e. many electrons could not return after their emission by these photons. However, positive masses of billion tons are emitted in coronal mass ejections daily and not milligrams.



GRAVITY AND ELECTRICITY

There are many differences between the two forces of infinite radius. The problems of the astrophysics of the last century have their origin in the fact that these differences were neglected. Moreover, the electric force of infinite radius was looked at as having short radius acting only in atoms. Positively charged atoms existed, but positively charged stars should not exist. Following table shows the two forces of infinite radius.
PermalinkPermalink 25/08/07 @ 15:06
Comment from: RayTomes [Member] Email · http://ray.tomes.biz/
I do not see the connection between my article and your question. Another star crashing into the Sun will disturb the planets even before it crashes, and depending on exactly what its path in is could well scatter the planets to oblivion.
PermalinkPermalink 26/08/07 @ 18:32
Comment from: RayTomes [Member] Email · http://ray.tomes.biz/
I have just noticed that I failed to answer the part of the question about the electric universe. I am sorry about that, I was deleting about 100 spam message when I saw that this one was not replied to.

Of course it is true that electric forces are so much greater than gravity and so even tiny differences in charge of celestial bodies would have profound effects. One of the effects would be that the motion of the planets would not be consistent with gravity to about 10 digits accuracy. That is because charge has a sign unlike mass, and if multiple bodies in the solar system had significant charges then there would be observed some repulsion forces between some pairs of planets. So that severely limits charge in the solar system to less than about 1 part in 10^45.

However there is still room for charge to play a part around the vicinity of the Sun or the vicinity of individual planets as long as there is a zero total within a shortish distance. Quite clearly the solar surface is seething with charge related activity. Even on Earth there are potential differences of hundreds of thousand of volts as me move upwards from the Earth. So electrical forces are locally important.

On larger scales in the universe such as galaxies and above then I do not think we know enough to decide. I can certainly see the possibility that Harmonics Theory is compatible with large scale electromagnetic wave phenomena. OTOH it might equally well be gravitational waves.
PermalinkPermalink 28/09/07 @ 15:44

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Wobbly Universe

Blog of Ray Tomes research on cycles, news reports on cycles, my original research on the Harmonics Theory and discussion of these matters.

There are cycles in everything. There are cycles in the weather, the economy, the sun, wars, geological formations, atomic vibrations, climate, human moods, the motions of the planets, populations of animals, the occurrence of diseases, the prices of commodities and shares and the large scale structure of the universe. None of these are independent of each other.

Research shows that very different disciplines often find the same cycle periods in their data. The inter-relatedness of all things is an idea who's time has come. The study of cycles is an excellent way to understand this because the periods of cycles are as easy to recognise as fingerprints or DNA sequences.

"The universe, believe it or not, is nothing other than a giant musical instrument with a very special but predictable pattern of harmonically related oscillations which determine the structure of everything from galactic clusters to subatomic particles and we are just parts of the various vibration modes."

The single axiom of the Harmonics Theory is that:

The Universe consists of a standing wave which develops harmonically related standing waves and each of these does the same.

Search

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 14

powered by
b2evolution